As I admitted in a previous blog post, I started this blog because blogging was cool at that time. Lots of people I knew were doing it so I jumped on to the bandwagon. However as time passed by I figured that writing can help me vent better. Of courses grievances against the family and friends will never make it to the blog, they are too personal, but against everything else (read the system) definitely will. But the busy and important banker that I think I am, the time to do this was also not found and blog posts were just one or two line life updates or movie recommendations. As time passed I also figured that I like telling stories, (someday I will blog about that day when a spellbound audience sat and listened as I explained the origins of the Mumbai Underworld and regaled them with stories about Vardarajan Mudaliar, Haji Mastan, Karim Lala and Dawood Ibrahin) and wanted to make lots of them (actually many are floating in my head but I need either a good beginning or an ending to complete them).
A simple aim which I set for myself was that I need to have at least 20 good stories ready by the time my kid is of an age when he or she can listen and enjoy them. Maybe this was my subcoscious way of giving myself lots of time so that all the lethargy and bouts of blank mindedness be taken care of. But now I have a realistic aim in front of me, so the stories shall be written. Not all shall be posted on the blog, but some definitely will make it here, so please keep checking from time to time (this is specially for the two and a half readers who read my blog regularly).
My first attempt at writing short stories was when I tried to create Metropolis. Being a huge science fiction and fantasy fan, I wanted to write something in that genre. However I soon realised that most books in this genre sound similar and most draw inspiration from Tolkein and C S Lewis (many don't but most of the ones I have read do). The worst part is that they all claim to be original, no doubt the stories were interesting but that was mainly because in my mind is programmed to love magic, heroes and adventures, just add some characters and you have a good story. But I wanted to write something original and different which was next to impossible given the reading influences I grew up with. So the idea for Metropolis was born.
The world which I am trying to create is where all the characters I love live together and fight together. Instead of lying and claiming that I have created a new race or a new land, I have shamelessly used all the concepts and ideas which I liked ad have created a crossover universe. Of course credit has been given wherever its due (Tolkien is a god in my universe and so is George Lucas). Since this is not a book or something which I intend to publish I dont see any legal issues here. Its just some fun and entertainment using speculative fiction. Which Sci-Fi / Fantasy fan would not like to see a Jedi Knight face off with a wizard or for that matter see Godzilla fighting fire breathing dragons. Well Metropolis has many such instances along with a original story.
So if any of you people out there like Fantasy mixed with Science, Marital arts and some mythology thrown in, please come back and read Tales from the Metropolis.
Friday, July 23, 2010
Thoughts on Recent Movies
This year has not been so active for me on the movie watching front. I am nowhere close to my 'a movie a week' days. One of the reasons is that I have become slightly more selective in the movies I watch these days, so no more watching movies because everyone else is watching it, it does not mean that I read a review before I watch every movie, I still watch many movies (and regret sometimes) because they sound or look interesting, but wherever I have a doubt, I wait for a review. This is because movie watching ain't cheap anymore. Despite having a multiplex which is minimum rickshaw fare away from home, the tickets, the crappy samosas, popcorn and pepsi prices still hurt.
Udaan is the best Hindi movie I have watched this year. A different story which strikes a chord and touches the heart and great performances make it a must watch. Second on my list of good movies this year is Love Sex aur Dhokha. First let me admit that I am a huge Dibakar Bannerjee fan. I absolutely loved Khosla ka Ghosla and Oye Lucky.., so my expectation from this one were sky high. And he did deliver, he took a risky proposition, unknown actors and made it into fascinating cinema. I see him right up there with Vishal Bharadwaj amongst the great directors in Bollywood today. Apart from this I enjoyed watching Ishqiya a lot, mainly for its performances. Raat Gayi Baat Gayi was also worth a watch. Rajneeti deserves a mention, I liked it, although I felt that the end was slightly long drawn, it would have been in the top two had the Mahabharat and Godfather tributes not been taken so seriously.
Raavan was the most horrible movie I have seen this year. I used to be a big Mani Rathanam fan, I enjoyed both Yuva and Guru immensely and expected a masterpiece from his. Besides I am a sucker for historical tales being retold differently. Simply put Raavan was a bad movie. The story moved extremely slowly and the performances were bad. Apart from the music and the great locations there was nothing in the movie, script, direction and performance was almost non existent. Housefull was another irritating movie from the Nadiadwala - Sajid Khan partnership. I thought that Sajid Khan must have reformed after Hey Baby and will give us an intelligent comedy, what we got instead was a silly gag. Can someone please tell them that slapstick is no longer fun. I used to laugh at people fumbling and falling and getting hit on their sensitive spots when I was five years old, I am 28 now and I will hugely appreciate it if some effort went into writing a script which could make me laugh. Akshay Kumar has natural comic timing and I absolutely loved him in Hera Pheri and Garam Masala. I seriously think that he should stick to working with good directors like Priyadarshan (yes he also makes silly movies sometimes) and stay away from retards like Sajid Khan and Shirish Kunder. Maybe my criticism is very harsh, but its from the heart, I blew up more than a grand and got the family to watch this movie in a fancy mall and there was a nice expensive lunch also thrown in after the movie.
On the english movie front Up in the Air looked was great and so was Inception. I was skeptical before watching Inception, I didn't understand Memento properly when I first saw it and I was expecting another confusing ride. But surprisingly I understood the movie and enjoyed it thoroughly. Nolan is a genius at identifying ideas and creating cinematic masterpieces from them. My love for superheroes and fantasy ensured that I liked Percy Jackson, Ironman 2 and Clash of the Titans. Shrek 4 was also a lot of fun, but the 3D glasses gave me a headache at the end of the movie. I was slightly disappointed by Alice in Wonderland, cant exactly pinpoint the reason why, but its was definitely not a bad movie. Maybe my expectations from the Burton-Depp partnership were too high.
On the hindi movie front am looking forward to watching Once Upon a Time in Mumbai, once again my love for gangster flicks will ensure that I watch this on the first day. I missed Tere Bin Laden and hope to watch it soon. On the english movie front, am eagerly awaiting the biggest of them all - Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1 in November. The trailer look great and I think this is one film which will rival 'The Return of the King' and Avatar in terms of gross.
Udaan is the best Hindi movie I have watched this year. A different story which strikes a chord and touches the heart and great performances make it a must watch. Second on my list of good movies this year is Love Sex aur Dhokha. First let me admit that I am a huge Dibakar Bannerjee fan. I absolutely loved Khosla ka Ghosla and Oye Lucky.., so my expectation from this one were sky high. And he did deliver, he took a risky proposition, unknown actors and made it into fascinating cinema. I see him right up there with Vishal Bharadwaj amongst the great directors in Bollywood today. Apart from this I enjoyed watching Ishqiya a lot, mainly for its performances. Raat Gayi Baat Gayi was also worth a watch. Rajneeti deserves a mention, I liked it, although I felt that the end was slightly long drawn, it would have been in the top two had the Mahabharat and Godfather tributes not been taken so seriously.
Raavan was the most horrible movie I have seen this year. I used to be a big Mani Rathanam fan, I enjoyed both Yuva and Guru immensely and expected a masterpiece from his. Besides I am a sucker for historical tales being retold differently. Simply put Raavan was a bad movie. The story moved extremely slowly and the performances were bad. Apart from the music and the great locations there was nothing in the movie, script, direction and performance was almost non existent. Housefull was another irritating movie from the Nadiadwala - Sajid Khan partnership. I thought that Sajid Khan must have reformed after Hey Baby and will give us an intelligent comedy, what we got instead was a silly gag. Can someone please tell them that slapstick is no longer fun. I used to laugh at people fumbling and falling and getting hit on their sensitive spots when I was five years old, I am 28 now and I will hugely appreciate it if some effort went into writing a script which could make me laugh. Akshay Kumar has natural comic timing and I absolutely loved him in Hera Pheri and Garam Masala. I seriously think that he should stick to working with good directors like Priyadarshan (yes he also makes silly movies sometimes) and stay away from retards like Sajid Khan and Shirish Kunder. Maybe my criticism is very harsh, but its from the heart, I blew up more than a grand and got the family to watch this movie in a fancy mall and there was a nice expensive lunch also thrown in after the movie.
On the english movie front Up in the Air looked was great and so was Inception. I was skeptical before watching Inception, I didn't understand Memento properly when I first saw it and I was expecting another confusing ride. But surprisingly I understood the movie and enjoyed it thoroughly. Nolan is a genius at identifying ideas and creating cinematic masterpieces from them. My love for superheroes and fantasy ensured that I liked Percy Jackson, Ironman 2 and Clash of the Titans. Shrek 4 was also a lot of fun, but the 3D glasses gave me a headache at the end of the movie. I was slightly disappointed by Alice in Wonderland, cant exactly pinpoint the reason why, but its was definitely not a bad movie. Maybe my expectations from the Burton-Depp partnership were too high.
On the hindi movie front am looking forward to watching Once Upon a Time in Mumbai, once again my love for gangster flicks will ensure that I watch this on the first day. I missed Tere Bin Laden and hope to watch it soon. On the english movie front, am eagerly awaiting the biggest of them all - Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1 in November. The trailer look great and I think this is one film which will rival 'The Return of the King' and Avatar in terms of gross.
My tryst with Cycling
I have been a sports enthusiast for as long as I can remember, I grew up watching Kapil Dev and Sachin doing their thing on the cricketing field, watching the football world cup and Becker-Edberg matches in Wimbeldon. Cricket, Tennis and Football were always the sports which I liked to follow and watch. FI got added to that list when I watched Ayrton Senna win the Monaco Grand Prix once on Doordarshan (yes they used to show such stuff sometimes). Since F1 was not very popular in India at that time (early 90s), Sportstar (a sports magazine from the Hindu Group) used to be a treasured possession for me because it used to have a 2 page feature on F1 results. Week after week I obsessed over the Senna-Prost rivalry.
With the advent of Start Sports and ESPN in India, Basketball got added to the list of sports I followed. Of course being the patriotic Indian that I am, following Chess and the results of Anand was mandatory. Following so many sports, studying stats and remembering records somewhat assuaged the guilt which I felt for not playing any sport seriously (Tennis happened much later in life). Cycling never figured on my radar, like most people around I knew who Lance Armstrong was, but nothing more than that about the sport. The Tour De France was a small 2 column article in the Times of India sports pages for 21 days in July, and year after year it reaffirmed that Lance Armstrong was the best cyclist in the Tour.
Lance retired after winning an impressive 7 Tour De France titles (the most by any rider) and cycling was promptly forgotten. However last year my curiosity about the sport was revived with the news that Armstrong was coming out of retirement to contest in the Tour De France again. Like me thousands of people who knew little about cycling but knew Armstrong started following cycling. And trust me, it was the most confusing sport ever. A person could win many many stages in a Tour but still wont be the champion, someone could be the champion without winning a single stage in a tour. Every stage or race was different and we could not have a single favourite for each stage. Yes tennis has its different surfaces and cricket its different pitches which support fast bowlers or spinners, but this was completely different. Tennis had Federer and Nadal who could dominate on every surface because they were good players, Cricket had its batsmen who could attack both spinners and fast bowlers, but I just didn't get cycling.
Cycling had its sprinters, time triallists and climbers. It also had its classics specialists and stage race specialists. A rider could be a good climber and a good time triallist (Contador, Armstrong etc) but could not excel at sprinting (maybe the great Eddy Mercxx was). Some riders could easily win races on short climbs but would fare miserably on longer ones. Slowly I started grasping the basics of the sport, learned what terms like peleton and domestique meant and surprisingly I found it to be quite an interesting sport. It is a rare combination of an individual and a team sport. Yes winners are individuals, but they cannot win without the help of their team. In my humble opinion its the ultimate team sport.
Sounds like a random statement from someone who has been following cycling for just two years? Let me explain. What is a team sport all about? A bunch of talented individuals performing together for a common cause. Great players who put individual glory and egos aside for the team. Cycling is all that and much more. Great cycling performances (am sure greats like Armstrong and Contador would acknowledge) are due to a strong team backing you. Domestiques protecting their team leader during tough climbs, reining in the attackers to defend the leaders position, lead out men producing bursts of speed to guide sprinters to victory in a group sprint are all examples of great team play. And its not even a sport where pure strength and stamina can win the day for you. Yes, its an endurance sport, but to excel you need to understand your body, train it and ensure that your performance peaks at the right moment. To add to the excitement there are lots of unknown factors which can alter the outcome of a race like crashes, punctures and bike malfunction. Weather also plays an important role, a rainy or an extremely hot day can wreck havoc in the peleton.
Cycling races tend to be long (around 150-200 kms average), so they usually last for 4-5 hrs so its slightly boring to watch, but the last half hour of any cycling race can be as exciting as the best football and tennis matches. The attacks and counter attacks, the build up to a bunch sprint and the sprint itself are as much fun to watch as the finale of a mountain stage where an attack in the final few kms can make or break a grand tour conquest. What we have is an overall package of entertainment - an individual sport where team support plays an important role. Many different types of races to cater to individual interests (sprints, climbs, time trials). Many different factors which affect the outcome of a race (cobbles, team support, weather, form etc) and many different events (Classics, short stage races, grand tours) to keep the average cycling enthusiast occupied. As an added bonus, its a sport which promotes a healthy and green lifestyle.
Thanks to Mr Armstrong, I am a passionate follower of cycling as a sport and will soon be buying a good bike when I move to an area where cycling daily is possible. Every sport has its heroes, great personalities who by their sheer charisma transform the sport into something popular and magical. Tiger Woods did it for golf and Federer (to a certain extent) for tennis. Thanks to Lance Armstrong and his high profile friends cycling is now noticed across the globe, a little more push outside Europe and we shall soon have a global sport followed by millions.
With the advent of Start Sports and ESPN in India, Basketball got added to the list of sports I followed. Of course being the patriotic Indian that I am, following Chess and the results of Anand was mandatory. Following so many sports, studying stats and remembering records somewhat assuaged the guilt which I felt for not playing any sport seriously (Tennis happened much later in life). Cycling never figured on my radar, like most people around I knew who Lance Armstrong was, but nothing more than that about the sport. The Tour De France was a small 2 column article in the Times of India sports pages for 21 days in July, and year after year it reaffirmed that Lance Armstrong was the best cyclist in the Tour.
Lance retired after winning an impressive 7 Tour De France titles (the most by any rider) and cycling was promptly forgotten. However last year my curiosity about the sport was revived with the news that Armstrong was coming out of retirement to contest in the Tour De France again. Like me thousands of people who knew little about cycling but knew Armstrong started following cycling. And trust me, it was the most confusing sport ever. A person could win many many stages in a Tour but still wont be the champion, someone could be the champion without winning a single stage in a tour. Every stage or race was different and we could not have a single favourite for each stage. Yes tennis has its different surfaces and cricket its different pitches which support fast bowlers or spinners, but this was completely different. Tennis had Federer and Nadal who could dominate on every surface because they were good players, Cricket had its batsmen who could attack both spinners and fast bowlers, but I just didn't get cycling.
Cycling had its sprinters, time triallists and climbers. It also had its classics specialists and stage race specialists. A rider could be a good climber and a good time triallist (Contador, Armstrong etc) but could not excel at sprinting (maybe the great Eddy Mercxx was). Some riders could easily win races on short climbs but would fare miserably on longer ones. Slowly I started grasping the basics of the sport, learned what terms like peleton and domestique meant and surprisingly I found it to be quite an interesting sport. It is a rare combination of an individual and a team sport. Yes winners are individuals, but they cannot win without the help of their team. In my humble opinion its the ultimate team sport.
Sounds like a random statement from someone who has been following cycling for just two years? Let me explain. What is a team sport all about? A bunch of talented individuals performing together for a common cause. Great players who put individual glory and egos aside for the team. Cycling is all that and much more. Great cycling performances (am sure greats like Armstrong and Contador would acknowledge) are due to a strong team backing you. Domestiques protecting their team leader during tough climbs, reining in the attackers to defend the leaders position, lead out men producing bursts of speed to guide sprinters to victory in a group sprint are all examples of great team play. And its not even a sport where pure strength and stamina can win the day for you. Yes, its an endurance sport, but to excel you need to understand your body, train it and ensure that your performance peaks at the right moment. To add to the excitement there are lots of unknown factors which can alter the outcome of a race like crashes, punctures and bike malfunction. Weather also plays an important role, a rainy or an extremely hot day can wreck havoc in the peleton.
Cycling races tend to be long (around 150-200 kms average), so they usually last for 4-5 hrs so its slightly boring to watch, but the last half hour of any cycling race can be as exciting as the best football and tennis matches. The attacks and counter attacks, the build up to a bunch sprint and the sprint itself are as much fun to watch as the finale of a mountain stage where an attack in the final few kms can make or break a grand tour conquest. What we have is an overall package of entertainment - an individual sport where team support plays an important role. Many different types of races to cater to individual interests (sprints, climbs, time trials). Many different factors which affect the outcome of a race (cobbles, team support, weather, form etc) and many different events (Classics, short stage races, grand tours) to keep the average cycling enthusiast occupied. As an added bonus, its a sport which promotes a healthy and green lifestyle.
Thanks to Mr Armstrong, I am a passionate follower of cycling as a sport and will soon be buying a good bike when I move to an area where cycling daily is possible. Every sport has its heroes, great personalities who by their sheer charisma transform the sport into something popular and magical. Tiger Woods did it for golf and Federer (to a certain extent) for tennis. Thanks to Lance Armstrong and his high profile friends cycling is now noticed across the globe, a little more push outside Europe and we shall soon have a global sport followed by millions.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)